Gil Cuatrecasas 1935 - 2004
The Cuatrecasas Discovery
Gil Cuatrecasas [1935-2004] was a master colorist who received significant critical acclaim in Washington in the 1960s. He was an important member of the Washington Color School, and his friends included Morris Louis and Kenneth Noland. Those masters have been enshrined in the pantheon of great American Color Field painters — a movement that paralleled Abstract Expressionism in New York. But Cuatrecasas carefully placed his collection into storage after a tragedy in 1976.
This exhibition is drawn from his “Torino Collection” — named for the Italian city in which Cuatrecasas painted in a grand villa from 1970 to 1976. Paintings from this series had originally been slated for a solo exhibition at the Contemporary Arts Museum of Houston. But beginning in 1976 Cuatrecasas suffered a devastating sequence of events that began with a destructive flood, was followed by a bout with alcoholism, compounded by tuberculosis, and ended with cancer. Art historian and curator Peter Hastings Falk points out that “Cuatrecasas was a genius of single-minded pursuit who created his own unique style,” says Falk, “Then he suddenly slipped from sight. Now his collection presents a new and compelling chapter in art history, shared by America and Spain.”
Celebration 1973acrylic on canvas86 x 80 inches ( 218.44 x 203.20 cm )
Celebration en situ 1973acrylic on canvas86 x 80 inches ( 218.44 x 203.20 cm )
detail of Celebration 1973acrylic on canvas86 x 80 inches ( 218.44 x 203.20 cm )
detail of Eye of Fire 1976acrylic on canvas99 x 186 inches ( 251.46 x 472.44 cm )
detail of Fireworks 1975acrylic on canvas160 x 90 inches ( 406.40 x 228.60 cm )
detail of Heavenly Pow-Wow 1976acrylic on canvas197 x 99 inches ( 500.38 x 251.46 cm )
detail of Windows 1976acrylic on canvas100 x 97 inches ( 254 x 246.38 cm )
Eye of Fire 1976acrylic on canvas99 x 186 inches ( 251.46 x 472.44 cm )
Eye of Fire en situ 1976acrylic on canvas99 x 186 inches ( 251.46 x 472.44 cm )
Fireworks 1975acrylic on canvas160 x 90 inches ( 406.40 x 228.60 cm )
Fireworks en situ 1975acrylic on canvas160 x 90 inches ( 406.40 x 228.60 cm )
Heavenly Pow-Wow 1976acrylic on canvas197 x 99 inches ( 500.38 x 251.46 cm )
Windows 1976acrylic on canvas100 x 97 inches ( 254 x 246.38 cm )
Windows en situ 1976acrylic on canvas100 x 97 inches ( 254 x 246.38 cm )
Cuatrecasas: The Discovery of a Master Colorist
Escaping Spain with his family during the brutal Franco uprising, Cuatrecasas grew up in the United States. He studied with Josef Albers at Yale in the 1950s, and became part of the Washington Color School. His works were shown at the museums of modern art in Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, and Barcelona, and in 1966 he enjoyed a solo exhibition at the Corcoran Gallery of Art. Then he suddenly resettled in his native Spain, where he broke out with an entirely new brushless style and technique. His large, bold paintings of colorful dendritic patterns form a transcendental botany. But in his spiritual exploration he became reclusive and shunned galleries. In 1976 a series of tragedies ensued with heartbreak and self-destruction, and his collection remained buried in storage for 40 years.
Youth: From Spain to America
Late in 1939 Martha Cuatrecasas quickly packed some clothing and with her children in tow fled war-wracked Madrid for the safety of Paris. A few years earlier the Germans had heavily bombed the city while Franco’s brutal fascist uprising continued to wage its reign of “White Terror,” murdering as many as 400,000 “leftists” Republicans. Picasso memorialized the tragic period with his iconic mural, Guernica. Gil was four years old; his brother Pedro three and sister, Teresa, five. Had they remained in Madrid they would surely have been arrested and killed. Martha’s husband, José — a famous botanist at the University — told them to flee quickly while he remained behind. Martha joined nearly a half million refugees who escaped to France.
Soon thereafter, José managed to leave Spain as a scientist in order to resume his high altitude expedition in the Andes mountain range of Colombia to collect plant specimens. But José feared for his family, correctly sensing that the Germans would soon occupy France. His wife and children were among the refugees who had been taken in by families in Paris. Thousands of Jews had already been fleeing Nazi Germany on passenger liners hoping that they would be accepted in Cuba or South America. José sailed the other way, retrieved his family, and returned to Bogotá, Colombia. By June, 1940, France had fallen. Afterwards, thousands of Spanish refugees in France were captured by the Nazis and sent to the concentration camps. In 1947, when Gil was twelve years old, the family relocated to the United States after José accepted a position at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. They settled in Bensenville, a small town just northwest of Chicago.
Discovering His Passion in Art:
From Harvard to the Washington Color School
Upon graduating from the local high school in 1953 Gil attended Harvard, at first intending to follow a career in medicine but then switching to the fine arts. Always sketching as a boy, his interest may have been triggered by courses in philosophy and a popular seminar on color theory taught by Professor Richard F. Brown. He was undoubtedly moved further by the 1955 Matisse exhibition at Harvard’s Busch-Reisinger Museum, as that master of color had died just the previous year.
Certainly, the environment for the fine arts was quite different as Cuatrecasas entered Harvard because two wars had just ended. No sooner had Paris been liberated from the Germans than Picasso, Matisse, Breton, and Duchamp surrendered a parallel war to a group of irascible young Abstract Expressionists in New York — led by Pollock, Rothko, DeKooning, and Kline. From that point on New York would be the epicenter of the art world. Esteban Vicente [1903–2001] remains the best-known Spanish artist to have fled Madrid for New York, becoming a member of that group of action painters in 1936. However, for most of Cuatrecasas’s generation of Spanish artists born in the 1920s–30s few would escape the pervasive influence of that great triumvirate of Spanish modern masters that preceded them: Picasso, Dalí, and Miró. As far as Abstract Expressionism was concerned, the strongest works in Spain included the heavily-textured mixed-media abstractions by Antoni Tàpies [1923–2012] and the figurative expressionism of Antonio Saura [1930–1998]. Notable, too, are the floating geometric shapes of Albert Ràfols-Casamada [1923-2009], the heavily-textured collages of Manolo Millares [1926–1972], and the exuberant play of circular shapes with action painting in the work of Joan Tharrats Vidal [1918–2001].
Cuatrecasas appreciated the seminal importance of Spain’s modern masters but felt compelled to follow a different path. Upon graduation from Harvard in 1957 he entered the highly selective graduate program at the Yale University School of Art, which had been headed by Josef Albers since 1950. Albers had immediately established a distinguished faculty and attracted important visiting teachers such as Willem de Kooning and Stuart Davis. Cuatrecasas was fortunate to have studied under Albers during the master’s final years at Yale. Even though Albers’s influence was profound, Cuatrecasas was restless and anxious to establish himself, so just before graduation he suddenly left Yale and set up a studio in the garage of his parent’s home in Washington, D.C. They had moved to the capital after his father accepted a position as a chief botanist with the Smithsonian Institution. Gil attended the Corcoran School of Art and became associated with a group of artists — including Gene Davis, Thomas Downing, Sam Gilliam, Kenneth Noland, and Morris Louis — who would later become known as the Washington Color School. From 1960–1961, he studied in Mexico City under a grant from the Pan-American Union (now the Organization of American States). When he returned to Washington he rejoined his colleagues and in 1964 their exhibition, “Nine Contemporary Painters,” appeared at the Pan-American Union curated by Lawrence Alloway of the Guggenheim Museum in New York. James Harithas, the director of the Corcoran Gallery of Art, had long been following Cuatrecasas’s development and in 1965 gave him a solo exhibition. “Very few people know how to paint,” commented Harithas, “and Gil was one of the brighter students who really stood out as very promising.” 1
A Unique Style Emerges in Spain
Unfortunately, parallel with Cuatrecasas’s early success he suffered some depressing experiences. First, the promise of marriage to a woman with whom he had fallen in love while at Harvard fell apart. Next, his dealings with art galleries, and the related financial issues left him deeply disenchanted. He sought to avoid the increasing social obligations that two significant exhibitions had placed upon him and shunned dealing with galleries. In 1966, shortly after his solo exhibition at the Corcoran, he moved to Barcelona, living in the apartment of an aunt — Montserrat Cuatrecasas — with whom he had a close relationship. He promptly converted one of her large bedrooms into a studio. His aunt, who became the first Director of the Miro Foundation’s Library and Documentation Centre at the Centre for the Study of Contemporary Art, became so impressed by the quality of his work and the intensity of his commitment, that she suggested a major move. In 1970 she invited him to move into her large villa outside of Torino, Italy. There she allowed him to transform most of her home into a huge studio — thereby enabling him to paint very large canvases. This expansive environment in Torino would prove the catalyst for the fulfillment of his artistic vision. During the next seven years the style that had begun to emerge in Washington and Barcelona entered its full bloom. Focused and prolific, Cuatrecasas covered the vast floors with canvas and produced hundreds of large paintings from eight to twenty-two feet long. Eventually, layers of paint concealed the beautiful marble floors and stacks of stretched paintings leaned against all the walls.
Understanding the wellspring of any artist’s creativity is often a difficult task. And Cuatrecasas compounded this task because he was purposely discreet; refusing to speak about his sources of inspiration or the messages he wished his paintings to impart. His role as a colorist began at Yale with Albers and continued to develop in Mexico and Washington. However, it is clear that the shapes he imbued with color reveal that their fountainhead was his exposure to and fascination with his father’s lifelong obsession with discovering and documenting what came to be 126 new species of a rare plant form that only exists at an altitude of about 15,000 feet in the northern end of Andes mountain range — the espeletia, commonly known as the frailejón. This bizarre plant produces daisy-like flowers on stalks that are protected by a central cluster of long broad leaves radiating like a crown sitting atop a thick cactus-like column nearly twelve feet tall — the whole appearing as a fantastic surreal sculpture. José’s pioneering work on this rare plant earned him accolades as one of the world’s great botanists. His magnum opus, A Systematic Study of the Subtribe Espeletinae, took a lifetime and was so massive that it was published 17 years posthumously in 2013.
It is not surprising, then, that his boys found great pleasure examining various life forms with the microscope given to them by their father. Gil was particularly fascinated by his father’s botanical drawings of the plant’s parts, especially its distinctive broad leaves. In Washington, Gil began to tap his father’s extensive herbarium of specimens of the leaves of the frailejón and began incorporating them with color paper fragments in a series of collages — an exercise learned from Albers.2 In addition, during the early 1960s he was commissioned to produce nearly one thousand exacting pen-and-ink botanical illustrations for a series of his father’s publications — and at least five-hundred of these drawings are in the collection of the Smithsonian Institution. The use of the herbarium for documenting a pharmacopoeia of Andean culture also had an impact upon Gil’s younger brother, Pedro, who became a renowned research pharmacologist.
Stylistically, therefore, many of the paintings in the Torino series reach beyond the purely non-objective, as they draw inspiration from the familiar botanical shapes of Cuatrecasas’s youth. The same broad leaves reappear consistently in his paintings but they are often not immediately recognizable. Cuatrecasas’s colleague Morris Louis also created a stylistically similar floral series but he used the very different technique of pouring thinned acrylics on raw canvas. These paintings, composed of overlapping leaf-like shapes of color, were produced in 1959–60 during a time when Cuatrecasas was also incorporating leaves into his collages and paintings.
Cuatrecasas created another prevalent botanical shape in his paintings, which he called the “thickets,” and these may have been a cross-section or “fingerprint” of the frailejón’s woody columnar stalk. Together, the broad leaves and the spikey stalk are recurring biomorphic shapes that play important roles, often overlaying each other and forming patterns while reveling in color.
Developing Avant-Garde Techniques
Cuatrecasas perfected decalcomania, an uncommon technique — discovered by the Spanish surrealist, Oscar Dominguez [1906–1957] in 1936 — where biomorphic dendritic patterns are created by chance. Invoking José’s documentation of many types of leaf forms, Cuatrecasas likely would draw a large frailejón leaf on a firm paperboard (or another firm material) and then cut it out to create a master plate. He would then paint the face of the plate, and with pigments still wet press the plate firmly onto the surface of the canvas. After rubbing the plate he would then have peeled it away. The transferred image revealed a delightfully unpredictable branching with an intriguing texture. The results vary depending upon the degree of manual pressure applied, the viscosity of the pigment, and the speed with which the plate is pulled off. The pigments typically form dendritic ridges similar to the crystalline tree-like patterns occurring naturally in certain moss agates. Cuatrecasas was certainly aware of the surrealist Max Ernst [1891–1976] who took decalcomania to new heights by creating a fusion of forms that appear to be figures and other natural forms in a kind of organic decay.
However enigmatic was Cuatrecasas’s character, it seems that he felt that his images should be even more mysteriously compelling, and he deepened the secret of his style by employing a mosaic of complex techniques. Beyond his pouring of pigments, the frottage, and the wet-on-wet folding of the canvas he also painted, crumpled, and pressed into service thin plastic sheets as tools to create texture — and even scraped away layers. Finally, subtle layers of glazing in his paintings add a diaphanous depth and bring out color.
Ultimately, Cuatrecasas’s paintings reveal their greatest affinity with the work of another colleague with whom he exhibited in Washington, D.C. — Sam Gilliam. Working 4,000 miles apart and unaware of each other’s latest experiments during the late 1960s–early 1970s, these two artists developed parallel styles independently, suggesting a spiritual zeitgeist, as they employed a brushless wet-on-wet technique with folding, creasing, and frottage. Viewers are inevitably drawn to protracted explorations of their canvases.
A Major Exhibition and a Dénouement
By the mid 1970s a stream of artists, poets, art critics, journalists, and gallerists visited Cuatrecasas’s studio in Torino to view his then quite large body of work. Perhaps the most famous and frequent visitor was the Italian art publisher and collector, Umberto Allemandi, who became a champion of the artist. “His total, obsessive devotion to painting impressed me deeply,” he wrote. “He came preceded by his fame of having left each of his studios, from Washington to Barcelona, choking with canvases.”
Allemandi and others who saw the collection produced in Torino during that seven-year period were profoundly moved and urged Cuatrecasas, albeit unsuccessfully, to exhibit. He wanted nothing to do with galleries or anything that distracted him from his painting. Instead, he remained compulsively focused and prolific, covering the vast floors of the Torino home with hundreds of large canvases from eight to twenty-two feet long. A partial explanation for his recalcitrance could be discovered in his bookcase. Most of the books were concerned with Far Eastern religions and philosophies such as Zen and Taoism. Others were about the occult and psychoanalysis. The titles reveal an introspective personality, a philosopher reticent to explain the origin and meaning of his paintings. He was also frugal in every aspect of his life — except when it came to the quality of his painting materials. Acrylics were a very large part of his budget, and he was very happy that he could buy top quality acrylics in Italy that cost less than those in the United States. Because he lived in Torino, it is most likely that he purchased his acrylics just 75 miles to the east in Milan where the Maimeri family produced their famous Brera brand, respected as among the finest pigments available worldwide. Their pigments are touted for their strength, elasticity, and color-fastness, drying to a permanent egg sheen finish. In fact, he agreed to sell three large canvases to Allemandi only because the transactions allowed him to purchase more pigments.
In 1973 Cuatrecasas returned to America to visit his sister in Syracuse, New York. There he reconnected with James Harithas, then the Director of the Everson Museum of Art in Syracuse. When Cuatrecasas showed him photographs of the body of paintings in the Torino series Harithas counted himself among the stunned. Two years later, when he was named the new Director of the Contemporary Arts Museum in Houston he invited Cuatrecasas to a solo exhibition intended to travel to other museums. Known as a provocateur, Harithas was hired to bring new energy into Houston’s art scene. “My mission was to bring to Houston first class works by important artists even if those artists were young and lacking recognition. Cuatrecasas’s paintings were beyond the taste of the moment. I showed Julian Schnabel at about the same time, years before he became famous in New York. Turned out that everyone in Houston hated me for it — but I didn’t care.”3
Harithas selected a collection of the large paintings and in 1976 had them shipped to the museum. Cuatrecasas would soon return to Houston to work with a team in unrolling the large canvases and fixing them upon their stretchers. But on June 15th — just two weeks before the exhibition was to open — Houston was suddenly hit with a tropical storm that dumped more than ten inches of rain in six hours. It was the worst flooding disaster in the city’s history, drowning eight people. Eight feet of water flooded the museum’s basement. Paintings by Josef Albers, Max Ernst, and Norman Bluhm and many others were destroyed. So were about 200 canvases and as many works on paper by Cuatrecasas. Naturally, the exhibition was cancelled.3
Cuatrecasas was understandably quite distraught and his despondency bordered on depression. Not only had he failed to recover proper compensation from the insurance companies but he had lost a major exhibition that would have reintroduced him to the art world. Harithas later observed, “Cuatrecasas would have become famous had he only gone to New York. I told him so, but he just seemed to shrug it off.”
Instead, Cuatrecasas returned to his aunt’s apartment in Barcelona as she had retired and sold the Torino villa. His brother recalled, “Within a few months, amazingly, his artistic restlessness and drive to paint again raised his spirits enough to lead him to take some bold action. With modest financial help from the family he bought a very large 200-year old stone farmhouse just outside of Barcelona. He worked immediately with rare zest with an architect and a builder to design exactly what he wanted: an enormous live-in studio where he could resume his life’s work. This was his new dream. The renovation began and moved along well for two years. He visited and managed the progress daily, driving his beloved old yellow Ford Pinto wagon he had shipped from Washington, D.C. Progress began to slow down in the third year of this complex process because of costs, construction complexities, and the frequent absence of the builder. Gil persisted with continual phone calls and visits, but to no avail. Finally, after nearly four years of increasing frustrations, all work stopped and Gil had little choice but to give up. The task failed. He just abandoned the farmhouse, never to see it again. His Pinto sat untouched in a garage for ten years. His last dream was shattered. This was a calamity that may have been his major career-ending event. He was now forever destined not to have a proper studio again.”4
From this point his creative energy progressively diminished. This was his dénouement. Mired in understandable despondence, and aggravated by his living circumstances, it seemed as if he heard the fates decree that his life’s work in painting would never re-emerge. But his aunt, Montse, would not give up. In 1979 she convinced him to hold a solo exhibition at the government’s well-known Galerías Syra in Antonio Gaudí’s iconic Casa Battló in Barcelona. Critics lauded the Torino paintings, citing their “chromatic exuberance,” and “absolute control over color.” Surprisingly, one even got him to speak of his having been inspired by the linearity and shapes of the Gothic wall paintings in the National Art Museum of Catalonia in Barcelona depicting the conquest of Majorca. Despite the accolades, Cuatrecasas only briefly attended the opening. Again, he showed no interest in selling.
Cuatrecasas not only ignored the substantive critical praise for his work, but he suffered a series of devastating setbacks during the last twenty-five years of his life that forever prevented his return to painting. First, he battled alcoholism, ultimately achieving sobriety. But he was a chain smoker, too, and in declining health he suffered from tuberculosis. Just days after his father passed away in Washington, so did Montse. Having lost his Guardian Angel, he also had to vacate her apartment. He moved to a small apartment that his parents had purchased many years earlier but he had no studio space at all. His brother Pedro wrote, “He remained despondent in his new apartment, unable to paint in such a restricted space, although he often wished and visualized painting again. That inner fervor was still there.” It was as if the circumstances imposed upon him dictated that that his life’s work in painting had become a chapter that had truly ended.
Finally, his last ten years saw him fighting the prostatic cancer that ended his life. But just before he passed, Pedro was going through papers in his brother’s Barcelona apartment when to his surprise he discovered a stack of unpaid bills from Security Storage in Washington, D.C. threatening to dispose of the contents in two rooms. Unknown to the family, Cuatrecasas had since about 1974 made several shipments of about 400 hundred large canvases carefully rolled up in heavy-duty kraft tubes, likely in anticipation of more exhibitions following Houston. “Like most details of Gil’s reclusive life, the existence of the Torino paintings was a total surprise. But there they were — rolled up in batches of two to six canvases that weighed up to 100 pounds per roll. Some canvases measured 22 feet long, and none had been displayed in the United States.”5
Art forensics has helped to unravel the mystery of Cuatrecasas’s technique. Stylistic analysis has shown the maturation of his vision. And art history will place him as a virtuoso of color. But unraveling the mystery of why such a prolific master would stop at the peak of his powers is far more complex. He was both an intellectual and a spiritualist who revealed a depth of character. Earning money from his art was never a motivation and he harbored a disdain for material things. He was reclusive, too, avoiding social occasions with people unknown to him. His sister, Teresa, often remarked that he should have lived in a monastery.
The revelation of Cuatrecasas’s chapter in the history of late 20th century painting is not only long overdue but brings together the artistic spirits of both America and Spain. In this process of discovery one gains a historical perspective that places him firmly in the ranks among those few brilliant colorists of his generation. Here was an artist who was never motivated to garner money or fame from his art. But he made this discovery possible only because forty years ago he cared so deeply about preserving his extraordinary collection of paintings.
Peter Hastings Falk
1 All quotes from James Harithas are from the author’s telephone interview with him on 20 August 2014.
2 Albers’s teachings were later published in in 1963 in his landmark Interaction of Color.
3 “CAM KO’d” (Texas Monthly, Aug, 1976, p.20)
4 All quotes from Cuatrecasas, Pedro. Gil Cuatrecasas, The Torino Collection, 1970-1976, An Undiscovered Treasure (San Diego: privately published, 2013)
5 Gelt, Jessica. “Brother rescues 400 lost works from storage unit by late Spanish artist Gil Cuatrecasas,” (Los Angeles Times, Arts & Culture section, 18 Feb 2016, Sec. E, p.1)
Cuatrecasas: A Discovery Toward Correcting the Art World’s Pathological Myopia
In 2007, a group of specialist fine art appraisers examined a group of paintings. Their independent conclusions: “decorative value…worth about $300 each.” In 2016, the mural-sized examples of those same paintings now cost more than $100,000. They are now en route to being considered masterworks. What happened?
No one cared about them, at first. The artist, Gil Cuatrecasas, worked with the most important color theorist of the 20th century, Joseph Albers, while attending the Yale School of Art in the fifties. He was friends with renown painters Louis Morris and Kenneth Noland and he painted intensely and single-mindedly for over twenty years on a unique body of work. Cuatrecasas shrugged off the anxiety of influence as a Spanish painter living within the shadow of the triumvirate: Dali, Miro and Picasso. Rather, Cuatrecasas’s paintings reflect the intimacy with which he understood color abstraction. With vibrant, saturated colors, these paintings indicate the significant contemporary artists Cuatrecasas personally knew and yet they maintain a unique perspective on color and abstraction that sets him apart. While he was a student at the Yale, he sought out other cutting-edge influences in New York such as the Abstract Expressionists. Cuatrecasas’s paintings look like the love child of Mark Rothko, Morris Louis and even obscure painter Harry Smith. For their time, these pieces were highly advanced and innovative, breaking ground alongside renowned artists of the time doing the same.
Many of Cuatrecasas’s paintings are 18-foot long colossal, paintings, and their apparently cracked and variegated abstractions are the makings of a transcendental botanist. Giant leaves appear etched into layers of filtered color through a process called decalcomania. This method is used for ink-blot tests by folding a sheet of paper with some wet paint on it in half to produce a duplicated image along the crease. The Surrealists championed this method, signaling allegiances with the theories of Sigmund Freud. But Cuatrecasas went a step further by creating massive scale abstractions through his process of diagonal, vertical and horizontal overlapping swatches of colors. His paintings are robust and they look like sunsets. Yet one hundred of these enormous pieces remained tucked away in storage, along with hundreds more, “sitting in darkness and silence, without a single showing, in over 40 years,” to quote Gil’s brother, Pedro, who discovered them in a security storage space with his wife Carol in 2004.
After their discovery, Pedro explained that at first, not one “art professional” was interested in exhibiting the work. Initially astonished by what Pedro and Carol found in storage, they spent three years copiously and painstakingly documenting these works to present them to the art world. For five years thereafter, they received rejection letters from the curators and gallerists they contacted. Pedro and Carol were stupefied by the lack of interest. They settled instead on making a 200-page coffee table book to give to their family and friends free of charge.
There is a simple answer why curators did not contact them back, enthusiastically even, about their discovery: auction house price indexes. The gallerists and curators Pedro sent the work to only had photographs, and never saw the work in person — some pieces are the size of large walls themselves. Knowing this makes a difference. When an art professional receives images of the work, they do background research by checking major biographical dictionaries as well as auction price databases. Pedro hired three art appraisers to review the work. The professionals checked the auction houses and significant international indexes. No work was sold at auction. There were no records of Cuatrecasas’s paintings anywhere. His work cannot be priced on precedence. Validation could only come through looking at the work. Because Cuatrecasas’s pieces cannot be priced, the appraisers thought they must have no value. The appraisers labeled the work with the pejorative term “decorative” and priced them a couple hundred dollars a pop. Cuatrecasas, in their minds, must be a nobody.
Sadly, the value of a piece of art is denigrated when there is an absence of published sources, of auction records, and of name recognition. The tragedy to art history is fairly clear: we are without a robust historical perspective as we continue to mythologize, fetishize, and commodify the few artists we know to praise when there are legions of artists like Cuatrecasas. These artists are just as good or better, but for whatever reason, they get sidelined. The art world’s pathological myopia is palpable, but who at the top has the courage to stop it?
Most art professionals who do not immediately recognize the name or the style of an artist are left clueless and indecisive when presented with a significant work of art. Ultimately they are insecure about recognizing art they can monetize, which in turn leads to their taking no action at all. Realizing that impairment and helping to correct it, while injecting new vigor and excitement about discoveries, is what the redM mission is all about. RedM’s educational mission can be the most understated goal in the arts, and yet it is most essential to it: redM seeks to expand the art historical canon by discovering and exhibiting the works of artists that may be as significant as the great masters in art history. We invite art patrons and collectors to be just as discerning as we have been in discovering these important treasures and to realize for themselves what it means to collect the works of exceptional redM artists.
by Janna Avner
Bringing a Treasure to Light: The Compelling Discovery of a Forgotten Master
In 1972, my 38-year-old brother, Gil, who was one year older than I, asked me to receive a shipment of his paintings from Torino, Italy, to place in a storage facility in Washington, D.C. At the time, I was a medical researcher on the faculty of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.
I gladly arranged for the transfer, and despite my curiosity, I never saw the contents of the crates. Our family had not seen Gil in about five years, and we missed him and his good-natured clowning around with our four children. We were glad to hear that he was very happy¬ — and obviously productive — in Italy.
Nearly thirty years later, while visiting Gil in his Barcelona apartment, my sister, Teresa, and I noticed large stacks of unopened mail on his living room table. With his consent, we sorted through many unpaid bills from Security Storage in Washington, D.C. The most recent bill stated that that the paintings would be put up for auction if all payments were not made within ninety days. I immediately called the company and promised to pay these and all future invoices.
Gil’s benign negligence of paying bills and other “trivial activities” of daily life was overshadowed by his customary good humor and affection. We simply attributed his neglect to his artistic temperament — and never lectured him. The fact is that Gil never sought material things. Rather, he was deeply immersed in serious literary and intellectual pursuits, as exhibited by his extensive collection of books on Eastern and Western religions, literature, poetry and philosophy — all with copious marginalia. His unquenchable thirst for knowledge had since about 1979 apparently substituted for the lack of a painting studio.
Sadly, after having battled prostate cancer for over eight years, Gil died in January of 2004. Fortunately, he spent the last year of his life in a retirement home with excellent medical and nursing care where he also made close friends who kept him in good spirits to the end.
A few months after Gil’s death, my wife, Carol, and I went to Security Storage in Washington, D.C. to see just what it was that we had helped Gil store there those many years ago. We found two rooms. One had many familiar framed and stretched paintings created by Gil during the early 1960s. The second room had well over one hundred rolls of canvases stacked vertically, including those from Torino which I had transferred there in 1972. Despite the tragic loss of hundreds of his paintings in a flood in Houston in 1976, the remaining number seemed quite abundant.
Due to the immense size and weight of the rolls, some eighty to one hundred pounds each, it was quite difficult to view the paintings. This was remedied with the help of four workers who constructed a large viewing platform using wooden horses and sheets of plywood on the large, hot attic floor of Security Storage. Each roll was opened on this platform for viewing, and then stacked on the floor before it was re-rolled. By the third roll we were stunned by the stylistic differences of the paintings compared to those painted in the 1960s. Roll after roll, we were dazzled by their size, color, and beauty. Every painting was unique and we were overcome by emotion while making these exciting discoveries.
I immediately decided that this body of work had to be preserved. I would apply all my energy and resources to help bring Gil’s collection to public view, with the conviction that by doing so the art world would surely recognize his creative genius. These paintings had been sitting in darkness and silence for over forty years, and it was astonishing that until this time, only the artist had seen them.
I knew that the path forward would be especially difficult and expensive due to the cumbersome size and weight of the paintings. We needed to carefully catalog and document every painting with data and photographic images. While we were at Security Storage that week I took digital photos of each painting. Carol kept a notebook with the roll numbers, painting numbers, dimensions, dates, physical conditions, and subjective descriptions. With such huge canvases, and the limited space, only photographic approximations were possible. I stood on top of a stepladder, steadying myself by pushing my head against the wooden ceiling and looking down at the platform with my small digital camera.
We were exhausted after six days, although we had documented only one-third of the rolls. We decided to highlight only the Torino-era paintings since these were clearly the culmination of Gil’s creative expression, and because they were so different from his previous work. Some months later, Carol and I returned for another strenuous ten days to finish our photo-documentation of what we called, “The Cuatrecasas Treasure: The Torino Collection.”
The next step was to obtain professional photography (4 x 5 or 8 x 10 transparencies), another complex and expensive task. I spent three days in the hot Security Storage attic preparing a large wall set-up for pinning up the large paintings. An expert art photographer from New York came by train and spent four long days to photograph about one hundred of them. I also sent thirty rolled canvases to a storage room near our home in San Diego, and later had them shot by a highly regarded art photographer in Los Angeles.
Next, I secured professional high definition scans (20-30 megabytes) of all the transparencies. After two years, I finally had the materials for assembling portfolios on CDs, presentation portfolios of 5 x 7 photos mounted on special white cardboard sheets, plus Gil’s curriculum vitae and biosketch. I sent these to many museums and galleries, proposing possible exhibitions of Gil’s work. The Spanish Ambassador and the Cultural Attaché in Washington offered to work closely to support any museum showing interest.
After finding many institutional impasses in my one-man attempt to reintroduce Gil to the art world, I decided to create a book solely for family and friends as a permanent documentation of Gil’s magnificent paintings. The book, Gil Cuatrecasas, The Torino Collection (1970-1976), An Undiscovered Treasure (San Diego: Jerry Anderson, Publisher), was issued in March, 2013. It contains a biography and more than 200 full-page illustrations with descriptions. It was enthusiastically received.
In late 2013, I read in The New York Times about the remarkable and dramatic posthumous discovery of the Armenian-American artist, Arthur Pinajian. The analogies of Pinajian to Gil were eerie. The article spoke of the highly respected art historian, Peter Hastings Falk, who had been closely involved in Pinajian’s discovery. I studied Falk’s background and liked his commentaries regarding the importance of discovering unrecognized “masters,” particularly posthumous ones. I was especially intrigued by his criteria in evaluating such artists, based on the intrinsic beauty and novelty of their art, rather than on name recognitions and traditional connections to galleries and museums.
I sent a long email about Gil to Falk, and amazingly, he responded immediately and very positively. I sent him the book of Gil’s work, and he again responded at once. Although he was personally enthusiastic, he was now waiting to receive the feedback from the experts on his Art Advisory Board, to whom he had sent electronic images of the book and paintings. A few months later he informed me of the committee’s positive responses, and of his interest in working with me to attract public attention.
A few weeks later, Falk visited me in San Diego for a firsthand look at some of Gil’s paintings hanging in our home, plus three rolls that I retrieved from storage. He examined each painting closely, noting their unusual style and technique. He was amazed, puzzled, and intrigued by Gil’s complex additive and subtractive painting application. He opined that Gil’s work was truly unique. Falk’s visit was a special opportunity to develop mutual respect, and to begin to develop a strategy for introducing this lost master to the world.
By coincidence, and before connecting with Falk, in early 2014 I had decided to transfer the remaining still-unphotographed rolls from Security Storage to San Diego (about 220 paintings). The complete photo-documentation of these involved particularly sophisticated technology and Herculean efforts by the expert digital photographer, Mark O’Donnell of Pixel 2 Editions, given that many of the canvases were over 18 feet long.
Now, in 2016, thanks to Falk’s extraordinary diligence and expertise, a group of Gil’s remarkable paintings are making a grand public appearance for the first time since his museum debut in Washington, D.C. more than fifty years ago. This exhibition runs during January through February at the CB1 Gallery in Los Angeles.
by Pedro Cuatrecasas, M.D.
GIL CUATRECASAS CHRONOLOGY
1935 - born in Madrid
1939 - escapes Franco uprising with mother and siblings, 1939
1939–40 - refugees in Paris
1940–1947 - family reunites in 1940 with father and move to Colombia, then Argentina
1947–1953 - family immigrates to Chicago
1951 - studies at The Art Institute of Chicago, 1951 (age 16)
1953 - in group exhibition at Fenton Art Gallery, Chicago, Illinois
1953–1957 - receives 4-year scholarship to Harvard University, 1953-1957. Graduates cum laude, B.A., specializing in the History of Art and Practices of Visual Arts.
1958 - attends the Corcoran Museum School, Washington, D.C.; in group exhibition, and earns diploma in painting and drawing.
1958–1960 - receives 2-year scholarship to the Yale School of Fine Art with a focus on painting; studies with Albers during Alber’s last year as director of the school
1959 - in group exhibition at Yale University Art Gallery
1960–62 - attends the National School of Fine Arts in Mexico City under a scholarship from the Pan-American Union (Organization of American States)
1962–65 - living and working in Washington, D.C.; exhibited with members of the Washington Color School
1964 - Lawrence Alloway (Senior Curator of the Guggenheim Museum) selects his work for Nine Contemporary Painters: US, at the Organization of American States (Pan American Union) an exhibition comprised of members of the Washington Color School
1965 - solo exhibition at The Corcoran Museum of Art, Washington, D.C.
- in group exhibition at the Museo de Arte Moderno de Buenos Aires, Argentina (MAMBA —The Buenos Aires Museum of Modern Art)
1966 - in group exhibition at the Museu de Arte Moderna de São Paulo, Brazil (MAM — The Sao Paulo Museum of Modern Art)
- solo exhibition at International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.
- leaves Washington, D.C. and settles in Barcelona
1967 - solo exhibition at the Institute of North American Studies, Barcelona
- in group exhibition at the Salón Náutico Internacional de Barcelona
1968 - solo exhibition at Gallery Tiziano, Barcelona
- in group exhibition at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Barcelona (MACBA) — May International Salon
1969 - solo exhibition at The Barcelona Athenaeum
- in group exhibition at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Barcelona (MACBA) — May International Salon
- settles in Torino, Italy, and develops his mature and unique style and technique, producing large paintings up to 22-ft long
1973 - Around this time he begins the first of several shipments of large canvases rolled up in strong tubes and ships them to Security Storage in Washington, D.C., likely in anticipation of exhibitions in the U.S.
1976 - solo exhibition at Contemporary Arts Museum, Houston, is cancelled because of a tropical storm that causes flooding, destroying the Cuatrecasas paintings and cancelling the exhibition
1977 - resettles in Barcelona. About this time makes his final (and largest) shipment of canvases to Security Storage in Washington, D.C.
1979 - final solo exhibition is held at Galerías Syra in Antonio Gaudí’s iconic Casa Battló in Barcelona.
1979–82 – begins renovation an 18th century stone farmhouse just outside of Barcelona — but the project is finally abandoned. Returns to his aunt’s small apartment in Barcelona, and without a proper studio, this was a major career-ending event.
1982–2004 - declining health, battling alcoholism and tuberculosis
2004 - dies in Barcelona from prostatic cancer
Form submitted Successfully
Thank you. Gil Cuatrecasas has been contacted.
Unable to submit form
There was a problem notifying the artist.